QVM Arrow QVM Equity Factor ETF
Quote as of Nov 09, 2020 20:50 UTC · Market data delayed approximately 15–20 minutes unless otherwise indicated.
| Previous Close | 20.45 | Day Range | 20.33 – 20.49 |
| 52-Week Range | 15.23 – 29.40 | Volume | 2.29K |
| Avg Volume | 558 | AUM | $5.1M (Aug 27, 2026) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | Yield (TTM) | — |
| NAV | 20.56 | Premium/Discount | -1.12% indicative |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2015 | Holdings | 50 |
| Issuer | — | Exchange | AMEX |
| Category | — | Index Tracked | Not stated in source data |
| CUSIP | — | ISIN | — |
| Management | Not stated in source data | ||
About this ETF
The investment seeks to replicate investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of AI Quality Value Momentum Index. The fund generally will invest at least 80% of its total assets in common stocks and exchange-traded funds (âETFsâ) that invest in common stocks that comprise the AI Quality Value Momentum Index. The index selects investments pursuant to a proprietary Tri-Factor⢠methodology that seeks to identify the components with the strongest fundamental performance characteristics.
Description from the fund data provider · profile as of Aug 27, 2026.
Price Chart
Daily closing prices (price return, not total return). Comparison lines are normalized to percent change from the range start. Source: Financial Modeling Prep.
Performance
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | Incep.* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price return | +3.98% | -6.60% | -4.34% | -30.88% | -31.57% | -8.64% | -3.56% | — | -3.52% |
| Total return | +3.99% | -6.31% | -3.56% | -30.07% | -29.73% | -6.05% | -0.95% | — | -1.17% |
* Annualized. Total return uses the dividend-adjusted price series (distributions reinvested); price return uses unadjusted closes. Performance through Nov 25, 2020. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees
| Net expense ratio | 0.65% | Annual cost of a $10,000 investment | $65.00 |
Illustrative calculation only: expense ratio × $10,000. It excludes trading costs, bid/ask spreads, taxes and changes in investment value. Gross vs. net expense details and any fee waivers are in the prospectus.
Holdings
Holdings as of Apr 17, 2023 — portfolio reporting date from the data provider; holdings are not live positions. 50 rows in database.
| # | Holding | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Target Corporation | TGT | 2.75% | 55.27K | $7.5M |
| 2 | Apple Inc. | AAPL | 2.62% | 52.53K | $7.1M |
| 3 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | NOC | 2.60% | 52.32K | $7.1M |
| 4 | Cummins Inc. | CMI | 2.60% | 52.29K | $7.1M |
| 5 | Lam Research Corporation | LRCX | 2.57% | 51.50K | $7.0M |
| 6 | The Home Depot, Inc. | HD | 2.56% | 51.38K | $7.0M |
| 7 | Seagate Technology Holdings plc | STX | 2.54% | 50.92K | $6.9M |
| 8 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | LMT | 2.52% | 50.54K | $6.9M |
| 9 | Best Buy Co., Inc. | BBY | 2.30% | 46.31K | $6.3M |
| 10 | CDW Corporation | CDW | 2.29% | 46.01K | $6.3M |
| 11 | Triton International Limited | TRTN | 2.25% | 45.21K | $6.1M |
| 12 | Royal Bank of Canada | RY | 2.24% | 45.16K | $6.1M |
| 13 | Gentex Corporation | GNTX | 2.21% | 44.44K | $6.0M |
| 14 | Celanese Corporation | CE | 2.20% | 44.31K | $6.0M |
| 15 | Oshkosh Corporation | OSK | 2.18% | 43.81K | $6.0M |
| 16 | Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | RS | 2.17% | 43.56K | $5.9M |
| 17 | T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | TROW | 2.14% | 43.12K | $5.8M |
| 18 | EV | EV | 2.11% | 42.40K | $5.8M |
| 19 | Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | WSM | 2.11% | 42.43K | $5.8M |
| 20 | LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | LYB | 2.11% | 42.51K | $5.8M |
| 21 | The Western Union Company | WU | 2.10% | 42.20K | $5.7M |
| 22 | Omnicom Group Inc. | OMC | 2.07% | 41.64K | $5.7M |
| 23 | The Bank of Nova Scotia | BNS | 2.06% | 41.35K | $5.6M |
| 24 | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | JPM | 2.02% | 40.59K | $5.5M |
| 25 | Magna International Inc. | MGA | 2.02% | 40.57K | $5.5M |
Click a ticker to see every ETF that owns it.
Sector Exposure
Geographic Exposure
Country weights as reported by the data provider. Developed/emerging/frontier labels follow the classification on the Methodology page. Currency hedged: No hedging indicated in the fund name.
Distributions
| Yield (TTM) | — | Paid (last 12 months) | — |
| Frequency | Quarterly | SEC yield | Not provided by our data source — see the issuer page |
| Last ex-date | Sep 16, 2020 | Last payment | $0.0650 |
| Growth 1Y | — | Growth 3Y / 5Y (ann.) | — / — |
| Ex-date | Record | Pay date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2020 | — | — | $0.0650 |
| Jun 16, 2020 | — | — | $0.1020 |
| Mar 16, 2020 | — | — | $0.0850 |
| Dec 26, 2019 | — | — | $0.4400 |
| Sep 16, 2019 | — | — | $0.1910 |
| Jun 17, 2019 | — | — | $0.1990 |
| Mar 18, 2019 | — | — | $0.0790 |
| Dec 28, 2018 | — | — | $0.3430 |
| Sep 17, 2018 | — | — | $0.1400 |
| Jun 18, 2018 | — | — | $0.1100 |
| Mar 16, 2018 | — | — | $0.1200 |
| Dec 26, 2017 | — | — | $0.3800 |
Trailing distribution yield = last 12 months of cash ÷ current price. It is NOT the SEC 30-day yield and distributions are not guaranteed to continue. The difference explained →
Risk Statistics
Liquidity
| Volume today | 2.29K | Average volume | 558 |
| AUM | $5.1M | Premium/Discount | -1.12% |
| Bid/Ask spread | Not provided by our data source. Check your broker's quote screen; spreads are widest at the open and close. | ||
Premium/discount compares the delayed market price with the last reported NAV — an indicative figure, not the official closing premium/discount. How ETF liquidity works →
Official Fund Resources
External links open the issuer's site or SEC EDGAR in a new tab. The prospectus and official documents are always the authoritative source — review them before investing.
Latest News for QVM
No articles mention this fund directly in the last 7 days — showing general ETF coverage.
Guided help: AUM is fund size. The expense ratio is the yearly cost baked into returns. NAV is the value of what the fund owns per share; the market price can sit slightly above (premium) or below (discount) it. Total return assumes distributions were reinvested. Every dataset shows its own as-of date because holdings, assets and quotes update on different schedules.